ADEC Future 2005 /

Home Page

Information

Activities

Presentations

Archives

Other Links

Wiki Help

Edit Password

  • edit
Home Page

The History of the Future of Distance Education in Alaska

ADEC Panel September 29, 2005 fake blog ping, doorst5; holiday 100 search: search lookup | home loans

The Current Situation

  • Distributed designers throughout Alaska with varied goals
  • Distributed deployment of courses with various common carriers
  • Decentralized survival with uneven spread of rewards
    • More of a University issue than a K-12 issue? Not a threat to current teaching assignment for K-12 ed…
    • Educators care about the students, but there are admin issues that can cause confusion
    • Contractual issues with unions/associations, is it part of workload or not. Staffing impacts.
    • Feeling desperate makes it easy to embrace innovation in delivery and pedagogy
    • Nervous about students leaving the districts for home schooling, etc.
    • As some needed courses are lost (AP, etc) faculty become more willing to look at alternative offerings.
  • Interlocked student body – students take courses from more than one institution
  • Online delivery accompanied by a need to preserve existing non-online delivery modes
  • Uneven appreciation for the real and potential quality of distance learning
  • Distance education is seen as a replica of onsite education
  • The reality of being decoupled from particular place (brick and mortar) is being obviously and actively challenged.
    • Mobile populations

Motivators for Change

  • Increased demand for enrollment
  • Increased number of non-traditional students
  • Increased competition for students with outside vendors
  • Change in student expectations for customized, personalized instruction
    • Digital natives and their expectations/understandings
  • Increase in Social Networking software enabling folksonomy categorization
  • Increase in meta-tagging to enable a “discovery” mode versus a “hierarchical categorization:.(individual storing of knowledge – desktop search)

Limiting Forces

  • Lack of easy articulation agreements to enable “swirling”
  • Uneven connectivity
  • High cost of software applications
  • High barriers to participation for distributed student cohorts due to centralized revenue generation and student credit hour accounting
  • Social software can have unintended effects in terms of filtering (user names, etc) and security
    • How do you protect kids?
    • A new emerging literacy (John Seely Brown)
    • Obligation for safety rules and regulations and policies
    • Fear driving our teaching techniques
  • Lack of knowledge/education of the teachers, faculty development/training
  • People don’t actually change, they talk about it, but in the end it’s hard and not “necessary”
  • How to subvert from within at the K-12 level
    • If you enable a student to use a tech and they find trouble, who is responsible?

Whaddaya Gonna Do?

  • Support decentralized survival with negotiated revenue sharing
  • Lower barrier to participation threshold with easy creation of interlocked low enrollment classes AKICE
  • Conceptualize distance education as safe havens for students embedded in communities of practice
  • Collaborate for common purchase of software tools
  • Require all teachers to take an online class… just as students should
  • The 6th graders of today will be the teachers of tomorrow— what will they expect in college?
  • Use tech as lever: provide information admin and instructors need through the technology itself.

Presentations

Recent Changes (All) | Edit SideBar Page last modified on December 26, 2007, at 12:38 AM Edit Page | Page History
Powered by PmWiki